| 翻訳と辞書 |
| McKaskle v. Wiggins ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
McKaskle v. Wiggins
''McKaskle v. Wiggins'', 465 U.S. 168 (1984), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court considered the role of standby counsel in a criminal trial where the defendant conducted his own defense (''pro se''). In this case the defendant claimed his Sixth Amendment right to present his own case in a criminal trial was violated by the presence of a court-appointed standby counsel.〔
〕
==Circumstances==
Carl Edwin Wiggins was on trial for Robbery and chose to proceed ''pro se'' and was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. The conviction was overturned on the technicality, that the indictment was defective and Wiggins requested counsel for the second trial.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Defending Oneself in Court - The Crime library )
〕 The trial court appointed standby counsel to assist him if requested. Wiggins decided to defend himself and asked that the standby counsel be barred from interfering. Multiple times, both before and during the trial, Wiggins changed his mind regarding the standby counsels' role. Wiggins sometimes allowed or even requested standby counsels' participation. He was once again convicted. After his conviction, Wiggins moved for a new trial on the grounds that his standby counsel had interfered with his presentation of his own defense. This motion was denied by the trial court.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=McKaskle V. Wiggins, 465 U. S. 168 (1984) — US Supreme Court Cases from Justia & Oyez )〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「McKaskle v. Wiggins」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|